In the annals of Indian political history, few events possess the intriguing confluence of audacious hijacking, political expediency, and the improbable ascension of individuals to political prominence as the hijack of Indian Airlines Flight IC-410 in 1978. This audacious act, orchestrated by two young men, Bholanath Pandey and Devendra Pandey, not only captivated the nation but also irrevocably altered their destinies. Their audacious act, a seemingly desperate gambit to secure the release of the incarcerated former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, catapulted them into the echelons of power, gifting them with political careers they could scarcely have imagined.
Their bold act of defiance, a testament to their fervent loyalty to the Congress party and its charismatic leader, Indira Gandhi, stands as a peculiar chapter in India's turbulent political history. This is the story of how an act of daredevilry, undertaken with the audacious aim of securing the release of a political luminary, became the springboard for their political careers. Their names, forever etched in the annals of the Indian Airlines hijack, became synonymous with audacity and unyielding loyalty. In a testament to the power of political leverage, their act of defiance, though unorthodox, became the linchpin for their rise to political prominence, a spectacle that continues to fascinate and confound observers of Indian politics.
"What he did was not bravery but audacity, but only a person deeply connected with someone, or something, can resort to such an extreme behaviour.” - Ajay Rai, UP Congress president
Indian Airlines Hijack: A Flight of Fancy Turns Into Political Expediency
The hijacking took place on December 20, 1978, with the Indian Airlines Flight IC-410 en route from Calcutta to Delhi via Lucknow. The two young men, dressed in the attire of ordinary citizens, boarded the plane in Lucknow, their true intentions shrouded in secrecy. As the Boeing 737 approached Delhi's Palam Airport, their audacious plan unfolded.
One of them, Bholanath, approached the flight purser with a seemingly innocuous request: to visit the cockpit. Their seemingly polite demeanour masked their sinister intentions. Devendra, Bholanath's accomplice, joined the conversation, amplifying the plausibility of their request. In that era, such requests were commonplace, a testament to the lax security protocols of the time. The flight purser, oblivious to their true motives, informed the captain, MN Battiwala, of their request. The pilot, unaware of the danger lurking in the wings, agreed to grant them access.
As the flight purser approached the cockpit, one of the hijackers, in a swift and decisive move, grabbed the air hostess, Indira Thakuri, by the elbow. Together, they forced the cockpit door open, their entrance met with shock and disbelief from the passengers and crew. A chilling silence fell upon the plane, punctuated by the unmistakable realization that a harrowing ordeal had begun.
The Hijackers' Demands: A Plea for a Political Prisoner
The pilot, Capt. Battiwala, with composure strained, announced over the public address system that the plane had been hijacked and would be diverted to Patna. However, the hijackers' demands were far from straightforward. They were not motivated by personal gain or material demands; their objective was singular: the release of Indira Gandhi, who had been imprisoned following the Emergency period. The hijackers, self-proclaimed Gandhians, saw themselves as champions of their political leader, their actions a desperate plea for her freedom.
The hijackers, armed with makeshift weapons, delivered impassioned speeches condemning Indira Gandhi's imprisonment, denouncing the Janata Party government, and extolling the virtues of the Congress Party. They raised slogans in support of Indira Gandhi and her son, Sanjay Gandhi, a move that resonated with Congress supporters on board, eliciting cheers and applause.
A Tense Standoff: Negotiations and the Demands for Indira Gandhi's Release
The plane, now under the control of the hijackers, landed at Varanasi Airport, where a tense standoff ensued. The hijackers, unwavering in their demands, demanded a phone conversation with the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Ram Naresh Yadav. Yadav, aware of the gravity of the situation, refused to engage with the hijackers, opting to avoid any concessions that could be interpreted as weakness. The hijackers, undeterred, escalated their demands, threatening repercussions if their demands were not met.
As the standoff intensified, the Prime Minister's office, closely monitoring the events, directed the Chief Minister to engage in negotiations with the hijackers. Yadav, accompanied by senior officials, flew to Varanasi, where he entered into tense negotiations with the hijackers. The hijackers, unrelenting in their pursuit, demanded the immediate and unconditional release of Indira Gandhi, along with the resignation of Prime Minister Morarji Desai. They also insisted on being allowed to address a press conference at the airport lounge, seeking to amplify their demands and exert pressure on the authorities.
The Negotiation Strategy: A Calculated Stall and a Twist of Fate
The Chief Minister, bound by the Prime Minister's instructions not to concede to the hijackers' demands, employed a calculated strategy of delay. He sought to defuse the situation by urging the hijackers to release the foreign and female passengers, a tactic aimed at buying time and reducing the tension. The negotiations, however, proved fruitless, with the hijackers refusing to yield. The standoff continued, with the fate of the passengers hanging in the balance.
As the hours ticked by, the situation within the plane became increasingly dire. The water supply ran out, leaving passengers, particularly the children, parched and distressed. The cramped conditions, coupled with the sweltering heat, led to complaints of suffocation. The hijackers, though unrelenting in their demands, displayed a strange mix of tenacity and ineptitude. It was this incongruity that ultimately led to their downfall.
The captain, sensing an opportunity, pulled back the emergency chute release lever, triggering the deployment of the emergency slide. Seizing the moment, a wave of passengers, eager to escape the tense atmosphere, scrambled down the tarmac. The hijackers, momentarily distracted, watched helplessly as the majority of the passengers fled to safety. However, a contingent of around sixty passengers remained on the plane, still under the hijackers' control.
A Farce Unveiled: The Hijackers' Illusions of Power
The authorities, determined to bring the ordeal to a peaceful end, convinced Dr. JD Pandey, Devendra's father and a government doctor, to intervene. His emotional appeal, pleading with his son to surrender, finally broke through the hijackers' resolve. Bholanath and Devendra, their audacious plan unraveling, finally surrendered to the authorities. The drama, which had gripped the nation for hours, came to an end at approximately 6:40 am on December 21, 1978.
In a bizarre twist of fate, it was discovered that the 'bomb' the hijackers had brandished was nothing more than a cricket ball wrapped in cloth, and their menacing guns were merely toys. The hijackers' grand act of defiance, designed to instil fear and force the government to bend to their will, was nothing more than a charade, a façade concealing their lack of true power. The hijack, once a terrifying spectacle, was now a black comedy, a testament to their naiveté and the fragility of their perceived power.
A Hijack Transformed into a Political Springboard
The hijack, though ultimately a farce, proved to be a watershed moment for Bholanath and Devendra. Just five days after the incident, on December 26, 1978, Indira Gandhi was released from prison. Her release, coinciding with the hijackers' surrender, was seen as a victory for them, a vindication of their audacious act. Their names, once associated with a brazen act of defiance, were now intertwined with Indira Gandhi's freedom.
The hijackers' act of defiance, while initially met with condemnation, was ultimately viewed through a different lens after Indira Gandhi's return to power in the 1980 general election. Their audacious act, once seen as a reckless act of desperation, was now interpreted as a display of unwavering loyalty to their political leader. They were lauded by Congress supporters, hailed as champions of Indira Gandhi, their names synonymous with loyalty and political conviction.
The hijack, an act of daredevilry, had unwittingly transformed into a political springboard for Bholanath and Devendra. Their connection to the Gandhi family, solidified by their act of defiance, granted them a coveted entrée into the political arena. Their audacity, once a source of concern, was now a badge of honour, a testament to their unwavering loyalty and political acumen.
From Hijackers to Politicians: The Legacy of Audacity
Indira Gandhi, recognizing the political capital they had accrued, rewarded their loyalty with political appointments. Bholanath and Devendra, once ordinary citizens, were now political figures, their names etched in the annals of Indian politics. Bholanath contested and won the 1980 Lok Sabha elections, securing a seat in the Indian Parliament, while Devendra won the state assembly elections, becoming a Member of the Legislative Assembly. They were rewarded for their audacious act, their hijack a testament to their unwavering loyalty to the Gandhi family.
Their political careers, launched by a hijack, were marked by a strange combination of audacity and pragmatism. They navigated the treacherous waters of Indian politics, their actions shaped by their political allegiance and the political landscape of the time. Bholanath, a two-time MLA, served as a close confidant of Rajiv Gandhi, Indira Gandhi's son, while Devendra continued his political career, winning multiple elections. Their political careers, though unconventional, were a testament to their tenacity and political prowess. Their names, once associated with an act of defiance, were now intertwined with the tapestry of Indian politics. They were the epitome of audacity and loyalty, their political careers a direct consequence of their audacious hijack.
The Legacy of the Hijack: A Tale of Audacity and Loyalty
The 1978 Indian Airlines hijack, a bizarre and unprecedented event, stands as a testament to the extraordinary confluence of audacity, loyalty, and political expediency. It was a story of ordinary citizens who, driven by their unwavering allegiance to a political leader, dared to defy the norms of society and challenge the established order. Their act of defiance, though ultimately a farce, catapulted them into the realm of politics, granting them a political platform they could never have imagined.
The hijack remains an enigma, a fascinating tale that blends audacious action with political pragmatism. It serves as a reminder of the complex and often unpredictable nature of Indian politics, where loyalty and political acumen can pave the way to extraordinary outcomes. The hijackers' act, though controversial, underscores the lengths to which individuals will go to demonstrate their allegiance to their political beliefs and the unexpected consequences that can arise from audacious actions. The hijack, a testament to the power of political manoeuvring and the influence of influential figures, continues to captivate and confound observers of Indian politics.
Comments